Dean & Bergen Streets Feedback Map

To add your comments:

How do you want to submit your comment:

Click on flashing icon on the map to drop a pin pin gray pin green route
close comments icon Comments (864)
close comments Comments (864)
Driving
Driving
Dean St - 4 Ave - Brooklyn

Taking away parking is going to make matters worse especially when there are events at the Barclays. Lets come to some middle ground. Prevent Trucks from driving there, put the bus routes on Atlantic and put speed bumps to prevent drivers from speeding down the street. Removing an entire parking lane is a really bad idea.

*Submitted via Accessible Feedback Form
Driving
Driving
Dean St - Carlton Ave - Vanderbilt Ave

I am a resident on this street, support bike safety but am not in favor of this project. I ride a bike but am also a car owner and think that taking away parking spaces in what is already a ridiculously competitive setting for parking spots would be a mistake and drastically decrease a different quality of life issue.

Street View
Driving
Driving
Dean St - Carlton Ave - Vanderbilt Ave

I am a resident on this street, support bike safety but am not in favor of this project. I ride a bike but am also a car owner and think that taking away parking spaces in what is already a ridiculously competitive setting for parking spots would be a mistake and drastically decrease a different quality of life issue.

Street View
Accessibility
Accessibility
Bergan St - Classon Ave - Franklin Ave - Brooklyn

Please do not move the bus from here or this side of Atlantic Avenue. As someone who is disabled having to walk all the way to the other side of Atlantic avenue to take the bus is significantly further and is not possible. There are already bus routes that go along Atlantic (through Bed Study etc) but there are none that go further into Crown heights, into Prospect Heights, Park Slope, Boreum Hill, Cobble Hill area. This is the only option for disabled people in this route and it is really essential that it is preserved. Otherwise people are not able to leave or have to rely on Ubers or other expensive options to travel. If the route needs to be changed to remove cars, please move it further into Crown Heights like along St. Marks, or Prospect Pl. The walk across Atlantic is significant and inaccessible.

*Submitted via Accessible Feedback Form
Public Transit
Public Transit
St Marks Ave - Carlton Ave - Flatbush Ave - Brooklyn

I am concerned that this project prioritizes concerns of bike community over other critical users, especially public transit users on the B65 line. This is a crosstown route which provides access to a number of subway stops and public facilites to community members, including elderly and students. This line has a logic in terms of being part of a unified system allowing movement in parts of Brooklyn where subways do not go and connecting other public transit lines - if moved to Atlantic Avenue it will lessen public transit options to Crown Heights and Prospect Heights community members as well as those in Cobble Hill and Boerum Hill. If moved to Atlantic Ave, the line will lengthen travel journeys for public transit users in the community, as well as require the many elderly residents, shoppers and student users of the line to cross the very wide and dangerous Atlantic Avenue to access bus service, this move is not justified by any other utility, since the other side of Atlantic is serviced by multiple bus lines already. Second, the existing plan to speed buses on Flatbush Avenue is already causing major traffic congestion on many streets in the area, particularly in the Western End of Prospect Heights and adjoining Park Slope as traffic is diverted to other streets. This bike boulevard proposal should be put aside until the effects of the Flatbush Avenue project can actually be evaluated for efficacy since it would be expected to create further crowding of the secondary streets in the area. Finally I question the logic of more widely spacing the bus stops which seems to be part of all these projects. While they may speed the buses, the bus users themselves already have subway options in many cases, and for many users, losing stops make the buses less convenient and more tiring. Given the population that actually use buses and the number of elderly in our communities, I question whether this is an appropriate policy choice.

*Submitted via Accessible Feedback Form
Bike
Bike
Pacific St - Rockaway Ave - Eastern Parkway

I can't stress the need for a bike lane all the way to the end of Eastern Parkway! I commute from E.Parkway and Pacific all the way to Chelsea Manhattan. We need safe routes for all!

Bike
Bike
Dean St - Nevins St - 3 Ave

I strongly oppose the proposed protected bike lane on Dean Street. This proposal overlooks the needs of the people who actually live, work, worship, and own property in our neighborhood. Our community is home to longtime residents, seniors, people with disabilities, families, and numerous churches, synagogues, and other houses of worship. A protected bike lane would have a significant negative impact on all of them. Dean Street is simply not wide enough to accommodate a protected bike lane without eliminating valuable on-street parking. Parking is already extremely limited, and removing an entire lane of parking would make daily life even more difficult for residents, visitors, and local businesses. We have already seen parking disappear due to Citi Bike stations—and other street redesigns, often without meaningful community input. Even the local farmers market removed multiple parking spaces while serving only a small footprint. The continued loss of parking has also contributed to more double parking, increased congestion, and additional traffic problems. It is frustrating to see these consequences used as justification for even more changes that further reduce parking. This proposal would also harm our community's faith institutions. Many congregants rely on buses, personal vehicles, and nearby parking to attend religious services and community events. Making access more difficult would disproportionately affect seniors, people with mobility challenges, and families with young children. Homeowners and taxpayers deserve to have their voices heard. We pay increasing property taxes and invest in maintaining our homes and neighborhood. Many of us depend on our vehicles for everyday tasks such as shopping for our families, transporting supplies, or making trips to stores like Home Depot or Lowe's for home repairs and improvements. Transportation planning should recognize that different residents have different needs rather than assuming one solution fits everyone. The existing bike lane already provides accommodations for cyclists. Creating a protected bike lane that comes at the expense of residents, businesses, houses of worship, and essential parking is not the right solution for Dean Street. Please reject the proposed protected bike lane on Dean Street and pursue transportation improvements that balance the needs of cyclists, residents, businesses, and the broader community.

Public Transit
Public Transit
New York Ave - Bergen St - Brooklyn

While I support the bike boulevard, I am concerned about the impact of relocating the B65 on a nearby bus route, the B45. I commute with my children to school on the B45 and it is jam packed during the school year, sometimes too full for us to even get on it. Moving the B65 north or suspending it will only put more pressure on the B45 for folks in Crown Heights North. If this project goes forward, it should be in conjunction with increasing the frequency of the B45.

*Submitted via Accessible Feedback Form
Bike
Bike
Bergen St - 4 Ave - 5 Ave

I often travel this route and by having it low traffic I would feel infinitely safer

Poor Visibility
Poor Visibility
Dean St - Franklin Ave - Rogers Ave

Please implement hardened daylighting measures in this dangerous / high-traffic intersection

Street View

Do you want to show us the area in StreetView before submitting?

close

Add comment

close

Comments should be related to the posted topic or specific project. The Projects and Initiatives website is not meant for comments that do not directly relate to the purpose or topic of the specific project. For general comments or communications concerning an agency, please contact the agency's Commissioner on www.NYC.gov. For service requests, please contact 311 Online.

drag

Pan left or rigth to show the area you wish to comment on.