Queensbridge gap in bike lane makes most use the sidewalk.
Please use the map below to provide any feedback, concerns, or suggestions you have regarding the Queens Waterfront Greenway. Please be as specific as possible.
This corridor will close gaps in cycling routes from Long Island City to Astoria to East Elmhurst to Fort Totten. Running parallel to the Long Island Sound, this route will improve transportation options throughout New York City's most diverse borough and enhance park access for Queens neighborhoods with limited green space. Connecting these neighborhoods with an active transportation network will particularly benefit Queens residents living within much of the planning area who are underserved by public transit access.
Queensbridge gap in bike lane makes most use the sidewalk.
- Rainey redesign bike lane seems pointless.
6.3 in Astoria Blvd has many problems, mostly reckless driving. (Spanish: 6.3 en Astoria Blvd tiene muchos problemas de reckless driving)
For health reasons, 6.1 is very close to the airport. (Noise, fumes, etc.) (Spanish: Por temas de salud, 6.1 está muy cerca al aeropuerto. [Olores, ruidos, etc.])
Which would you prioritize? Thinking about health, the neighborhood, children and family, noise pollution and smog by airplanes. I would make 6.3 and not 6.1 instead. (Spanish, original: CUAL PRIORIZARÍA? PENSANDO EN SALUD DEL NEIGHBORHOOD, LOS NIÑOS Y LA FAMILIA, CONTAMINACIÓN DE SONIDO Y SMOG POR LOS AVIONES. YO HARÍA 6.3 AL EN VEZ 6.1 INSTEAD)
As a driver, driving on Astoria Blvd is already chaos. Installing a bike lane could worsen the situation? Considering that Northern and other larger roads are also impacted. (Spanish, original: COMO DRIVER / MANEJAR EN ASTORIA BLVD YA ES UN CAOS. INSTALAR UNA CICLOVÍA PODRÍA EMPEORAR LA SITUACIÓN? CONSIDERANDO QUE NORTHERN Y OTRAS VÍAS GRANDES TAMBIÉN SON)
6.3 has much more space but the tradeoff is the risk of reducing parking, it raises complaints and has bus lanes (translated from Spanish: 6.3 tiene mucho más espacio pero el tradeoff es corre riesgo de reducir parking, arriesga quejas y tiene líneas de buses)
Queens Blvd turned out very well, 6.3 Astoria Blvd would be similar. Chaotic and with traffic, but it would be much safer (translated from Spanish: Queens Blvd quedo muy bien, 6.3 Astoria Blvd sería similar. Caótico y con tráfico pero sería mucho más seguro)
6.2 is an industrial road but more direct (translated from Spanish: 6.2 es una vía industrial pero más directo)
Meridian Rd. is not wide enough. For 7.3, too many variables here for a bike lane.
Comments should be related to the posted topic or specific project. The Projects and Initiatives website is not meant for comments that do not directly relate to the purpose or topic of the specific project. For general comments or communications concerning an agency, please contact the agency's Commissioner on www.NYC.gov. For service requests, please contact 311 Online.
Pan left or rigth to show the area you wish to comment on.
To add your comments:
How do you want to submit your comment: